The gap between “technically correct” and “legally admissible” is where many IR cases fall apart. Technical evidence that cannot be authenticated in court is worthless for prosecution.
Evidence Documentation Framework
# Evidence Collection Log Template
# Complete this BEFORE touching any evidence
cat << 'EOF' > evidence_log_$(date +%Y%m%d_%H%M%S).txt
EVIDENCE COLLECTION LOG
=======================
Case Reference: [IR-YYYY-XXX]
Date/Time (UTC): $(date -u)
Collector Name: [Full Name]
Collector Role: [Title]
Witness Present: [Full Name, Title]
Location: [Physical address, room]
SCENE CONDITION:
[Describe exactly what was found, system state, any anomalies]
EVIDENCE ITEMS:
Item 1:
Type: [Hard drive / USB / Laptop / Server]
Make/Model/Serial:
Capacity:
Current State: [Powered on/off, screen contents if on]
Collection Method: [Live acquisition / Dead imaging]
COLLECTION METHOD:
Tool Used: [FTK Imager / dd / KAPE / etc.]
Tool Version:
Verification Hash (MD5):
Verification Hash (SHA-256):
Image File Path:
Image File Size:
CHAIN OF CUSTODY:
Time Out of Collector's Possession: [or N/A if maintained]
Collector Signature: _______________ Date: _________
Witness Signature: ________________ Date: _________
EOF
Hash Verification — Proof of Evidence Integrity
# Compute hash of physical drive BEFORE imaging (source hash)
# Using write-blocker or read-only mode
# Linux: compute SHA-256 of source device
sha256sum /dev/sdb | tee source_hash_$(date +%Y%m%d).txt
# Windows (FTK Imager): hash is computed and stored in the .txt case file automatically
# After imaging: verify the image matches the source
sha256sum evidence_$(date +%Y%m%d).dd
# This value MUST match the source hash — discrepancy = evidence is inadmissible
# For E01 images, verification is built in:
# FTK Imager → Verify Drive/Image → compares stored hash to current hash
# Log the verification:
echo "SOURCE HASH: $(cat source_hash_$(date +%Y%m%d).txt)" >> evidence_log.txt
echo "IMAGE HASH: $(sha256sum evidence_$(date +%Y%m%d).dd)" >> evidence_log.txt
echo "VERIFICATION: $([ source_hash == image_hash ] && echo MATCH || echo MISMATCH)" >> evidence_log.txt
# Make working copy (for analysis — never work on the master image)
cp evidence_$(date +%Y%m%d).dd working_copy_$(date +%Y%m%d).dd
# Verify working copy matches master before analysis
sha256sum working_copy_$(date +%Y%m%d).dd
Physical Evidence Handling
Evidence handling for physical media:
- Anti-static bags: hard drives in conductive anti-static bags — static discharge can damage magnetic media
- Tamper-evident seals: evidence bags with sequential number tags that show if opened; log the tag number
- Write blockers: hardware or software write-blockers must be used during live analysis of physical drives; document which write-blocker was used
- Secure storage: locked evidence room with access log; for sensitive cases, CCTV-monitored storage
- Transportation: courier documentation for any evidence leaving the facility; chain of custody continues through transport
EVIDENCE SEAL LOG
Item: Hard Drive #1 [Serial: XXXX]
Bag #: EVB-20240901-001
Sealed by: [Name] at [Time]
Seal intact when received by: [Name] at [Time]
Seal broken for analysis by: [Name] at [Time], witnessed by: [Name]
Re-sealed with Bag #: EVB-20240901-002 at [Time]
When Law Enforcement is Involved
Engaging law enforcement changes evidence handling requirements:
LAW ENFORCEMENT ENGAGEMENT CHECKLIST
Before contacting LE:
☐ Obtain legal counsel approval for LE engagement
☐ Document the decision-making rationale (why LE is being engaged)
☐ Prepare evidence summary (not the raw evidence — the summary)
☐ Identify what the organization is willing/able to share vs. keep confidential
When LE arrives:
☐ Request all LE personnel sign a non-disclosure agreement (where legally permissible)
☐ Provide copies of evidence, NOT originals — LE gets a forensic copy
☐ Document what was provided to LE (date, time, person who received, copy hash)
☐ Obtain a receipt for any physical evidence LE takes
After LE engagement:
☐ LE may ask you to stop your own investigation — comply if instructed (evidence contamination concern)
☐ Document all communications with LE (dates, what was discussed, any instructions given)
☐ Understand: LE investigation timeline (months/years) differs from IR timeline (days/weeks) — coordinate with counsel on parallel workstreams